A provocative line from Silicon Alley Insider suggesting that since newspapers are not proving very adept at publishing and selling advertising online, maybe they should just pare their business down and stick to print.
We’re not convinced the best way newspaper companies such as Hearst, McClatchy and A.H. Belo can serve their various private and public shareholders is to try and win the online advertising game.
Usually here is where we say newspapers need to try charging for access to their content. But this time, let’s explore further.
In our story about investors who wanted to take the Seattle Post-Intelligencer and its costs off parent-company Hearst’s hands, we relayed the argument that instead of wasting capital trying to innovate online, maybe newspaper companies should pare down to their remaining profitable papers and funnel their earnings into a nice fat dividend.
After all, manufacturing newspapers is the newspaper companies’ core competency; solving the online advertising problem is not. We noted that Earthlink is doing something similar in the Internet-service provider business.
We asked “Did any of the railroads manage to become profitable airlines? No.”
Since then, an investor who tried to buy the Rocky Mountain News pointed us white paper from the Mitchell Madison Group’s Arnon Mishkin that seems to support part of our argument — that it’s at least worth considering if the best place for newspapers might not be online.
Here’s our favorite bit:
The conventional wisdom is that all media companies need to figure out how to take their business model and transform it to the web – Almost all of them have heeded the late Harvard Professor Theodore Levitt’s famous lesson of what killed the railroads: “They thought they were in the railroad business, not the transportation business.” But after ten years of following Levitt’s advice, it’s not at all clear that the traditional media model works on the web.
There is also the possibility that the web will not be a place where content will create sources to be viable on the web. value. In fact, there’s just one unfortunate thing about Levitt’s compelling mantra about railroads and the transportation business.
The key line in here is ‘it’s not at all clear that the traditional media model works on the web’. Well, who said it would? The goal for news companies is not to replicate themselves online but reinvent themselves online. What’s required is a new model of newsgathering and delivery adapted to online ecosystems. More of the same won’t do.
All Evolving Newsroom
Plan B for newspapers: leave online alone
A provocative line from Silicon Alley Insider suggesting that since newspapers are not proving very adept at publishing and selling advertising online, maybe they should just pare their business down and stick to print.
More here.
The key line in here is ‘it’s not at all clear that the traditional media model works on the web’. Well, who said it would? The goal for news companies is not to replicate themselves online but reinvent themselves online. What’s required is a new model of newsgathering and delivery adapted to online ecosystems. More of the same won’t do.