Comments on: Journalism innovation finalists are worth watching http://evolvingnewsroom.co.nz/journalism-innovation-finalists-are-worth-watching Journalism links and observations from Julie Starr Mon, 23 Apr 2012 10:11:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: Julie Starr http://evolvingnewsroom.co.nz/journalism-innovation-finalists-are-worth-watching/comment-page-1#comment-92 Julie Starr Fri, 12 Sep 2008 01:39:00 +0000 http://evolvingnewsroom.co.nz/2008/08/11/journalism-innovation-finalists-are-worth-watching/#comment-92 Do you mean, would Wired choose not to report on edits made in that way? Do you mean, would Wired choose not to report on edits made in that way?

]]> By: Simon Owens http://evolvingnewsroom.co.nz/journalism-innovation-finalists-are-worth-watching/comment-page-1#comment-91 Simon Owens Thu, 11 Sep 2008 12:57:00 +0000 http://evolvingnewsroom.co.nz/2008/08/11/journalism-innovation-finalists-are-worth-watching/#comment-91 I wonder if they would consider any company that edits Wikipedia entries to be out of bounds. For instance, if a transparent PR person were to go in and -- using the Wikipedia rules -- place in accurate information on behalf of a company? I wonder if they would consider any company that edits Wikipedia entries to be out of bounds. For instance, if a transparent PR person were to go in and — using the Wikipedia rules — place in accurate information on behalf of a company?

]]>