<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is 10% the magic number for paywalls?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://evolvingnewsroom.co.nz/is-10-the-magic-number-for-paywalls/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://evolvingnewsroom.co.nz/is-10-the-magic-number-for-paywalls</link>
	<description>Links and observations on news and journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:45:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Bennett</title>
		<link>http://evolvingnewsroom.co.nz/is-10-the-magic-number-for-paywalls/comment-page-1#comment-7220</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 06:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolvingnewsroom.co.nz/?p=2465#comment-7220</guid>
		<description>10 percent sounds ambitious to me. I can&#039;t quote current numbers for the Australian Financial Review - which has the advantage of a wealthy, niche audience - but when three years ago the paying online audience wasn&#039;t even one percent of the total.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10 percent sounds ambitious to me. I can&#8217;t quote current numbers for the Australian Financial Review &#8211; which has the advantage of a wealthy, niche audience &#8211; but when three years ago the paying online audience wasn&#8217;t even one percent of the total.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
